Airlines around the world are lining up for the Airbus A321XLR which launched at the Paris air show. After the news that Aer Lingus and Iberia ordered the aircraft, things have continued apace with Qantas and American Airlines both signing on.
Frontier, Wizz Air and JetSMART have also been added to the order book today. You’d be forgiven for thinking the Airbus A321XLR was just another derivative of a common model, so why are airlines clamouring to get a hold of them?
Airbus A321XLR Addresses A Gap In the Market
There is a requirement by airlines to be able to fly a smaller number of passengers longer distances. This was addressed to an extent with the Boeing 787 Dreamliner and Airbus A350, which were designed with this mission in mind.
-
- Qantas and Jetstar will operate the Airbus A321XLR
However there is another important element to consider, which is the long range narrowbody. These are aircraft such as the venerable Boeing 757, which you find flying transatlantic routes among others.
-
- Aer Lingus will open up more flights with the Airbus A321XLR
The last Boeing 757 rolled off the production line in 2004, and it has been replaced to a large extent by the Airbus A321neo. Well over 2,000 are on order and not even 200 are in service so you will likely find yourself on one in the future.
-
- Iberia are also getting the Airbus A321XLR
The prevailing trend in aviation is to connect more cities directly rather than having to go via a hub. With the long range twins being too heavy to efficiently do shorter long distance flights, something else was required. Hence, the Airbus A321XLR.
What Routes Will It Permit?
Aer Lingus have already stated they will be able to fly to all of the USA and Canada from Dublin. Checking out the range map shows this is quite true, plus there are plenty of options the other way, such as to the Middle East.
-
- Plenty of places within range from Dublin
Those wondering what 4,600 nautical miles or 8,520 kilometres of range looks like for flights from New York, wonder no more. Flights can be scheduled as far south as Brazil, and to all of Europe and West Africa.
-
- Flights from New York on the Airbus A321XLR
Frequent flyers down under will find a lot of water on their journey on some directions. Out of Sydney, places such as Singapore are easily reachable, while flights from northern ports such as Cairns will be able to go all the way to Japan.
-
- Flights from Sydney, Australia
New routes that might be marginal or loss making with a heavy widebody have the potential to be profitable with the economics of a narrowbody. This is why the orders are rolling in.
Overall Thoughts
The Airbus press release touts the advantages of the Airbus A321XLR. While airlines will like it as it will be efficient for them, passengers will also reap benefits as they will have more direct flights available to where they want to go. Everyone knows that having to connect is not particularly efficient or fun.
While the aircraft will have lie flat seats and all the amenities expected for international flights, spare a thought for the crew. Cross fingers they get proper galleys that are spacious to work in, rather than the ultra space saving ones some get today.
What do you think of the Airbus A321XLR? Do you mind flying on a long flight on a narrowbody? Thank you for reading and if you have any comments or questions, please leave them below.
To never miss a post, follow me on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
All my flight and lounge reviews are indexed here so check them out!
All images rendered by FIXION via Airbus.
Maps from Great Circle Mapper.
Are you aware of this new thing where Inside Flyer copies your whole article and reposts it? Because it just happened.
Yes, I’ve noticed this, it’s part of some testing that the BoardingArea gurus are doing. I only noticed it relatively recently. Thanks for the heads up, I appreciate it!
I think my longest narrow body flight was SLC-ANC. I did one way in F and one-way in Y. In first, I can take anything you throw at me. In economy, I think this flight was my limit- I won’t do anything longer.
I usually don’t worry about it too much. When you consider long haul travel was all narrow body up until 1970, it’s really not too big of a deal. As long as I have my inflight entertainment and food I’m happy enough. Thanks for the comment!
The narrowbody concerns me, partially because of congestion and a lot because of potential discomfort for hours. Didn’t Airbus more or less promise to maintain at least 18″ wide seats a few years ago? If they keep that promise, it would make for less discomfort on a 8+ hour flight.
The Airbus cabin width is marginally wider than the Boeing and always has been. The seats are pretty standard, and you couldn’t fit more across. It makes no real difference as long as the seat is comparable to long haul, with seat back screens and what not. Thanks for the comment!